vol28no2pa5

TJES: Al-Hazragi A , Lateef A , .Behaviour of Uniaxial Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened with Ultra-High Performance Concrete and Fiber Reinforced Polymers. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2021; 28(2): 54- 72.

APA: Al-Hazragi A , Lateef A , . (2021). Behaviour of Uniaxial Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened with Ultra-High Performance Concrete and Fiber Reinforced Polymers. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences, 28 (2), 54- 72.

References

[1] Allam HM. Strengthening of loaded columns by RC jackets. Ph.D. Thesis. Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University; Cairo, Egypt :1995. [2] Beaupré, D. Bond strength of shotcrete repair. Shotcrete Magazine 1999; 1 (2) : 12–15. [3] Bsisu KI. Retrofitting of square reinforced concrete columns with steel jackets. Ph.D. Thesis. Jordan University; Jordan: 2002. [4] Meda A, Plizari GA, Rinaldi Z. Strengthening of RC existing columns with high performance fiber reinforced concrete jacket. University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy 2009.

[5] Winter G, Nilson AH. Design of concrete structures, 9th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979. Fig.20: modes of failure for specimens Abd-al-Salam I. M. Al-Hazragi , Assim M. Lateef / Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences (2021) 28(2): 54-72. 71 [6] Ferguson PM, Breen JE, Jirsa JO. Reinforced concrete fundamentals.4th ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981. [7] Hadi MN. Eccentric loading of externally confined fiber reinforced concrete columns. Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials 2007; London: Taylor and Francis. Wollongong university: p. 63-68. [8] Murugadoss JR, Lee BJ, Bang JW, Ganesh PG, Kim YY. Performance analysis of CFRP composite strips confined RC columns under axial compression. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 2015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/170295. [9] Beschi C, Meda A, Riva P. Column and joint retrofitting with high performance fiber reinforced concrete jacketing. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2011; 15(7): 989-1014. [10] Richard P, Cheyrezy MH. Reactive powder concretes with high ductility and 200-800 MPa compressive strength, Concrete Technology: Past, Present, and Future, Proceedings of the V. Mohan Malhotra Symposium 1994; S Francisco, ACI SP144: p. 507-518. [11] Abdulrahman MB, Rashid HM. Repairing of reactive powder concrete T-beams containing web opening by CFRP Strips. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2019; 26(1): 9-19. [12] Abdulrahman MB, Mahmood SM. Strength of Reinforced Reactive Powder Concrete Hollow Beams. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2019; 26(2):15-22. [13] Danha LS, Khalil WI, Al-Hassani HM. Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete (RPC) with Various Steel Fiber and Silica Fume Contents. Engineering and Technology Journal 2013; 31(16) Part (A) Engineering: 3090-3108. [14] Abdulrahman MB, Ali AA, Younus AM. Effecting of steel fibers and fly ash on the properties of concrete. Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences 2018; 25(4): 30-36. [15] Tsonos AG.Steel fiber high strength reinforced concrete, A new solution for earthquake strengthening of old RC structures. Wit Transactions on the Built Environment 2009; 104: 153-164. 10.2495/ERES090141. [16] Menna C, Mazia C, Sgobba S, Asprone D, Prota A. Structural behavior of strengthened RC columns using high performance fiber reinforced concrete. 4th International Conference symposium on Ultra High Performance Concrete and High Performance Construction Materials 2016 Mar 9-11; Kassel, Germany. Kassel University. [17] In YK, Sung GH. Strengthening (RC) columns with ultra-high performance concrete. The Structures Congress 2016 Aug 28-Sepr 1; Jeju Island, Korea. [18]Bassam A, Tayeh, MN, Samir S, Mohammed A. Repairing and strengthening of damaged (RC) columns using thin concrete jacketing. Advances in Civil Engineering 2019; Article ID 2987412, 16 pages 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2987412. [19]Iraqi Specification No. 5/1984. Portland Cement. [20] Iraqi Specification No.45l/1984. Aggregate from Natural Sources for Concrete and Construction. [21] ASTM C1240-03. Standard Specification for Use of Silica Fume as a Mineral Admixture in HydraulicCement Concrete, Mortar, and Grout. [22] ACI Committee 211. Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete (ACI 211.1-91) Reapproved 2002; American Concrete Institute Farmington Hills 1991, 38P.Nagamoto N, Ozawa. [23] ASTM C 143/C 143M-15, Standard test method for slump of hydraulic cement concrete. Book of ASTM Standards 2015; American Society for Testing and Materials: p.1-4. [24] ASTM C1437. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement pastes and mortars of plastic consistency 2015. [25] ACI Committee 440, 2R-08. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures. American Concrete Institute, Michigan, USA, 2008: 80. Abd-al-Salam I. M. Al-Hazragi , Assim M. Lateef / Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences (2021) 28(2): 54-72. 72 [26] Hadi MN. Comparative study of eccentrically loaded (FRP) wrapped columns, Composite structures .Elsevier 2006; 74 (2): 127-135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.03.013. [27] Amer MI, Nazar KA, Wissam DSFlexural behavior and sustainable analysis of polymer bubbuled reinforced concrete slabs. 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures 2013 Dec 11-13; Melbourne, Australia. [28] Priestley MJN, Park IR. Bridge columns under seismic loading. ACI Structural Journal 1987; 84 (1): 61-76. [29] Sullivan TJ, Calvi GM, Priestley MJN. Initial stiffness versus secant stiffness in displacement based design. 13th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering 2004 Aug 1-6; Vancouver, BC, Canada. Paper No. 2888. [30] Kumar V, Iqbal, MA, Mittal AK. Energy absorption capacity of prestressed and reinforced concrete slabs subjected to multiple impacts. Procedia Structural Integrity 2017; 6: 11-18.

 

Tikrit Journal of Engineering Sciences (2021) 28(2) 54- 72.

Behaviour of Uniaxial Reinforced Concrete Columns Strengthened with Ultra-High Performance Concrete and Fiber Reinforced Polymers

Abd-al-Salam .. Al-Hazragi *1 Assim ..Lateef 2

0 Civil Department/ Engineering College/Tikrit University /Tikrit, Iraq

* Corresponding author: ‫civilengabd833@gmail.com‬‏،  

DOI: http://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.28.2.05

Abstract

This article investigates the behaviour of strengthened concrete columns using jacketing ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) under uniaxial loaded. The jacket was connected to the column core using shear connectors and (CFRP) fixed as a strip on the tension zone between the column cores and the jacketing. Seven column samples of square cross-section (120 x120) mm at the midsection with overall length of 1250 mm were cast using normal strength concrete (NSC) and having similar longitudinal and transverse reinforcement. The samples were made and tested under axial load at eccentricity equal to 120 mm up to failure. Test parameters were the thickness of jackets (25 and 35) mm and the width of CFRP (0,8, and 12) cm. Column specimens were tested, one of them was reference without any strengthening, and the other specimens divided into two groups (A, and B), and each group included three specimens based on the parameters. Group (A) has UHPFRC jacket thickness 25 mm and CFRP width (0,8, and 12) cm respectively, and group (B) has UHPFRC jacket thickness 35 mm and CFRP width (0,8, and 12) cm respectively. The outcomes of the article show that increasing the thickness of jacket, and width of CFRP lead to increase in the load carrying capacity about (110.5%,168.4%, and 184.2%) for group A, and (157.9%,226.3%, and 263.2%) for group B compared with the reference column due to delay in the appearance of cracks and their distribution. The mid-height lateral displacement of columns was decreased about (66.6%,42.3%, and 35.9%) for group A, and (46.15%,38.46%, and 32.3%) for group B, also the axial deformation of specimens decreased about (71.7%,60.86%, and 55.86%) for group A, and (65.5%,60.5%, and 53.4) for group B compared with the reference column. The ductility of columns that were strengthened with UHPFRC jacket only was increased about (13.67%,19.66%) for thickness(25,35) mm respectively, because of that UHPFRC jacket was contented on steel fibers, and the percentage decrease of ductility was about (5.1%,and 12%) for group (A), (1%,and 9.4%) for group (B) when bonded CFRP in the tension zone with width (8 ,and 12) cm respectively. The results show improvement in the initial and secant stiffness when, increased the thickness of jacket, and width of CFRP because of increase in the size of columns and improvement in the modulus of elasticity. The toughness increase was about (273.97%,301.55%, and 304.5%) for group A, and (453.69%,511.93%, and 524.28%) for group B compared with the reference column because of increase in the size of specimens and delay the appearance of cracks.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?
Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download

Download Full-Text PDF

Keywords: Concrete Columns, CFRP, Jacketing, UHPFRC.

Related Articles